Industry Analysis
This is the first major phase of your company analysis project, where you’ll continue working with the company your group chose. Here’s the breakdown:
- Define the Industry:
- Clearly identify the relevant industry for each of your company’s strategic business units (SBUs).
- If your company has multiple SBUs, focus on the “cash cows” and “stars” that generate the most revenue.
- Strategic Group Analysis:
- Categorize competitors based on similarities in their strategies and business models.
- Five Forces Analysis:
- Analyze the industry’s current attractiveness using Porter’s Five Forces framework.
- Consider whether different strategic groups experience the five forces differently.
- Please refer back to the industry analysis reading for a detailed example and walk-through.
- PESTLE Analysis:
- Use the PESTLE framework to assess the industry’s future attractiveness.
- Discuss how your PESTLE findings might impact the strategic groups you identified.
Key concepts & examples:
Review the assigned readings on Industry Analysis and the class slides for helpful explanations and examples.
Research & Tools:
- NotebookLM: Conduct your analysis using NotebookLM, populating your notebook with all relevant source materials.
- Authoritative Sources: Stick to credible sources like company 10-K reports, earnings call transcripts, analyst reports from reputable investment banks, and industry data providers (e.g., IBISWorld).
- Summaries: Use your NotebookLM skills to summarize information from these sources into a submission-ready format.
Submission Details:
- Format: Submit as a .docx or PDF file, approximately 5 pages long.
- Notebook Link: Include a link to your NotebookLM notebook with your submission.
- Deadline: February 13th
- Points: 100 points
Rubric for Industry Analysis Project (100 points)
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Fair | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Definition & SBU Focus | Clearly and accurately defines the relevant industry for each SBU. Focuses on the most important “cash cow” and “star” SBUs. | Defines the relevant industries but may have minor inaccuracies or lack focus on key SBUs. | Industry definitions are vague or incomplete. May not prioritize key SBUs. | Fails to clearly define the relevant industries or identify key SBUs. |
Strategic Group Analysis | Provides a insightful and well-supported categorization of competitors into strategic groups. Clearly articulates the basis for grouping. | Categorizes competitors into strategic groups, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in the grouping rationale. | Attempts to categorize competitors but the grouping is unclear or poorly justified. | Fails to meaningfully categorize competitors into strategic groups. |
Five Forces Analysis | Conducts a thorough and insightful Five Forces analysis, demonstrating a strong understanding of the framework. Clearly discusses the impact on different strategic groups. | Conducts a Five Forces analysis, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in some areas. Discusses the impact on strategic groups with some limitations. | Applies the Five Forces framework with some errors or omissions. Discussion of strategic groups is limited or absent. | Fails to effectively apply the Five Forces framework or discuss its implications for strategic groups. |
PESTLE Analysis | Conducts a comprehensive PESTLE analysis, identifying key trends and their potential impact on the industry’s future attractiveness. Clearly links findings to strategic groups. | Conducts a PESTLE analysis, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in some areas. Links findings to strategic groups with some limitations. | Applies the PESTLE framework with some errors or omissions. Discussion of strategic groups is limited or absent. | Fails to effectively apply the PESTLE framework or discuss its implications for strategic groups. |
Clarity & Presentation | Analysis is well-written, logically organized, and easy to follow. Presents information in a clear and concise manner. | Analysis is generally well-written and organized, but may have some minor issues with clarity or conciseness. | Analysis lacks clarity or organization, making it difficult to follow. May have significant writing or presentation issues. | Analysis is poorly written and presented, with major issues in clarity, organization, and overall quality. |
Total Points: 100