Business Strategy Analysis Project
This assignment dives deep into your company’s competitive advantage. Here’s what you’ll be exploring:
- Identify Key SBUs:
- Start by listing the important strategic business units (SBUs) or product categories within your company. At a minimum, include the “cash cows” and “stars.”
- Analyze Competitive Advantage:
- Evaluate the “customer willingness-to-pay” and “supplier-opportunity-cost” drivers for the SBUs that give your company its edge. ()
- Perform an activity analysis to pinpoint the specific activities in the value chain that set your company apart from the competition.
- Discuss the factors that help your company sustain this competitive advantage and how long-lasting these factors are likely to be.
- Innovation for the Future:
- Detail your company’s efforts in process, product, or technology innovation that aim to protect and enhance its future competitive advantage.
Key concepts & examples:
Review the assigned readings on Competitive Advantage, Sustaining Competitive Advantage, and Leading Breakthrough Innovations and the class slides for helpful explanations and examples.
Research & Tools:
- NotebookLM: Conduct your analysis using NotebookLM, making sure to populate your notebook with all relevant source materials.
- Authoritative Sources: Stick to credible sources like:
- Company 10-K reports
- Earnings call transcripts
- Analyst reports from reputable investment banks
- Industry data providers (e.g., Capital IQ)
- Summaries: Use your NotebookLM skills to summarize information from these sources into a submission-ready format.
Submission Details:
- Format: Submit as a .docx or PDF file, approximately 5 pages long.
- Notebook Link: Share a read-only link to your NotebookLM notebook with me.
- Deadline: March 20th
- Points: 100 points
Grading Rubric:
Rubric for Business Strategy Analysis Project (100 points)
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Fair | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
SBU Identification | Clearly and accurately identifies the company’s key strategic business units (SBUs) or product categories. | Identifies SBUs, but the list may be incomplete or contain inaccuracies. | Attempts to identify SBUs, but the selection is unclear or lacks focus. | Fails to identify the company’s key SBUs. |
Competitive Advantage Analysis | Provides a thorough and insightful analysis of the “customer willingness-to-pay” and “supplier-opportunity-cost” drivers of the company’s competitive advantage. | Analyzes the drivers of competitive advantage, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in some areas. | Attempts to analyze the drivers of competitive advantage, but the analysis is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to analyze the drivers of competitive advantage. |
Activity Analysis | Clearly identifies and analyzes the specific activities in the value chain that contribute to the company’s competitive advantage. | Identifies relevant value chain activities, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity. | Attempts to analyze the value chain, but the analysis is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to analyze the value chain or identify relevant activities. |
Sustainability & Durability | Provides a well-reasoned discussion of the factors that sustain the company’s competitive advantage and their likely durability. | Discusses the sustainability of the competitive advantage, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity. | Attempts to discuss the sustainability of the competitive advantage, but the discussion is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to discuss the sustainability or durability of the competitive advantage. |
Innovation Analysis | Provides a detailed and insightful analysis of the company’s innovation efforts (process, product, or technology) to protect and enhance its future competitive advantage. | Analyzes the company’s innovation efforts, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in some areas. | Attempts to analyze the company’s innovation efforts, but the analysis is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to analyze the company’s innovation efforts. |
Clarity & Presentation | Analysis is well-written, logically organized, and easy to follow. Presents information in a clear and concise manner. | Analysis is generally well-written and organized, but may have some minor issues with clarity or conciseness. | Analysis lacks clarity or organization, making it difficult to follow. May have significant writing or presentation issues. | Analysis is poorly written and presented, with major issues in clarity, organization, and overall quality. |
Total Points: 100