Corporate Strategy Analysis Project
This assignment focuses on understanding your company’s corporate strategy and how it creates value. Here’s what you’ll analyze:
- Corporate Portfolio:
- Describe your company’s corporate portfolio, including all organizational units operating in distinct product and geographic markets.
- Apply the “better-off,” “ownership,” and “organizational” tests (explained in the assigned corporate strategy reading) to explain why these units belong together.
- Compare your company’s portfolio with its competitors, providing a critical commentary on the differences and similarities.
- Impact on Competitive Advantage:
- Revisit the “willingness-to-pay” (WTP) and “supplier-opportunity-cost” (SOC) drivers you identified in the previous competitive advantage analysis.
- Analyze the net effect of your company’s portfolio on these WTP and SOC drivers.
- Historical Analysis:
- Identify 3-5 landmark corporate events in the company’s recent history.
- Focus on events such as acquisitions, divestments, spin-offs, mergers, alliances, and new geographic and product market entries and exits.
- Critically evaluate the rationale and performance review that management offered to investors and analysts for these events.
- Organizational Structure:
- Analyze your company’s organizational structure choices (centralization, decentralization, shared services, etc.) and how they connect the business units.
- Explain how these choices affect the WTP and SOC drivers.
Key concepts & examples:
Review the assigned readings on Corporate Strategy and Competing Globally for helpful explanations and examples.
Research & Tools:
- NotebookLM: Conduct your analysis using NotebookLM, populating your notebook with relevant source materials. Share a read-only link to your notebook with me.
- Authoritative Sources: Stick to credible sources like:
- Company 10-K reports
- Earnings call transcripts
- Analyst reports from reputable investment banks
- Industry data providers (e.g., Capital IQ)
- Summaries: Use your NotebookLM skills to summarize information from these sources into a submission-ready format.
Submission Details:
- Format: Submit as a .docx or PDF file, approximately 5 pages long.
- Deadline: April 8th
- Points: 100 points
Rubric for Corporate Strategy Analysis Project (100 points)
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Fair | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Application of Corporate Strategy Tests | Accurately and insightfully applies the “better-off,” “ownership,” and “organizational” tests to explain why the units belong together in the portfolio. | Applies the corporate strategy tests, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in some areas. | Attempts to apply the corporate strategy tests, but the analysis is superficial or shows limited understanding of the concepts. | Fails to effectively apply the corporate strategy tests or demonstrates a misunderstanding of the concepts. |
Impact on WTP & SOC | Provides a comprehensive and well-supported analysis of the net effect of the corporate portfolio on the company’s “willingness-to-pay” (WTP) and “supplier-opportunity-cost” (SOC) drivers. | Analyzes the impact of the portfolio on WTP and SOC, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in some areas. | Attempts to analyze the impact on WTP and SOC, but the analysis is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to analyze the impact of the corporate portfolio on WTP and SOC. |
Historical Analysis | Identifies and critically evaluates 3-5 landmark corporate events, providing a well-reasoned assessment of management’s rationale and performance review. | Identifies landmark corporate events, but the analysis of management’s rationale and performance may lack depth or critical evaluation. | Identifies some corporate events, but the analysis is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to identify or analyze landmark corporate events. |
Organizational Structure Analysis | Provides a thorough and insightful analysis of the company’s organizational structure choices and their impact on WTP and SOC. | Analyzes the organizational structure, but the analysis may lack depth or clarity in explaining the impact on WTP and SOC. | Attempts to analyze the organizational structure, but the analysis is superficial or incomplete. | Fails to analyze the company’s organizational structure or its impact on WTP and SOC. |
Total Points: 100